Apples, galavsRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork leads in Protein (9 vs 0) and Sugar (10 vs 12) and 3 more, while Apples, gala leads in Dietary Fiber (2 vs 1) and Sodium (0 vs 293).
Macronutrients (per 100g)
N/A
Calories
260
0
Protein
9
0
Total Fat
15
15
Carbohydrates
26
2
Dietary Fiber
1
12
Sugar
10
N/A
Cholesterol
22
Vitamins & Minerals (per 100g)
0
Sodium
293
7
Calcium
45
0
Iron
2
104
Potassium
151
N/A
Vitamin C
2
Similar Comparisons to Apples, gala vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
More comparisons with Apples, gala
More comparisons with Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Data sourced from USDA FoodData Central (CC0 1.0 Universal (public domain)).