Beef, chuck, roast, boneless, choicevsTomatoes, crushed, canned
Beef, chuck, roast, boneless, choice leads in Protein (19 vs 1) and Sodium (49 vs 158) and 1 more, while Tomatoes, crushed, canned leads in Calcium (18 vs 4) and Potassium (323 vs 279).
Macronutrients (per 100g)
N/A
Calories
N/A
19
Protein
1
17
Total Fat
0
0
Carbohydrates
7
N/A
Dietary Fiber
2
N/A
Sugar
4
66
Cholesterol
N/A
Vitamins & Minerals (per 100g)
49
Sodium
158
4
Calcium
18
2
Iron
1
279
Potassium
323
N/A
Vitamin C
10
Similar Comparisons to Beef, chuck, roast, boneless, choice vs Tomatoes, crushed, canned
More comparisons with Beef, chuck, roast, boneless, choice
More comparisons with Tomatoes, crushed, canned
Data sourced from USDA FoodData Central (CC0 1.0 Universal (public domain)).